Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Blog#3

I have chosen a scene from the movie, “A Chorus Line”. The story is about an audition for the Broadway show. The scene that I picked is a very beginning scene, and I think that in this scene, the editing is well-done and creates the energized and competitive moods in the audition well. This scene starts with an establishing shot of outside of the theater in which the audition is taking place. The camera first shoots the top of the theatre and moves downward, and then it shoots a long line of the dancers for the audition. This shot shows audience that how competitive this audition is by showing the long line for the audition. Then, the scene changes to the stage of the theatre and suddenly switches to a close-up shot of the choreographer who has just turned back. He is very serious and choosing dancers for the second audition. This close-up shot of the choreographer establishes the vigor mood overall. At the same time, it shows how serious his is and creates the nervous feeling of dancers. The establishing shot changes to the close-up shot all of a sudden, and the cut is obvious; however this obvious, sudden cut gives audience a strong impression and emphasizes the intensity of the audition. Thus, I thought it is successful. After the close-up shot, the camera starts moving away from the choreographer gradually, and it follows him wherever he goes on the stage, and it changes to a next shot: the camera angle changes to high-angle, so that the shot shows all dancers dancing on the entire stage. Even though the camera angle changes suddenly, this cut seems like that it is seamless because it keeps the same color feeling and creates the feeling of continuity. On the other hand, the cut from the establishing shot to the close-up of the choreographer changes the feeling of the color: the color feeling changes bright outside to darker inside of the theatre. The color difference makes the cut between these shots obvious and impressive.

The video clip of the scene:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w0THRk2VYM8

Monday, February 8, 2010

Blog #1, MEDP 160

Today, a lot of websites which allow us to interact with other people are showing up continuously, and everybody's attentions keep shifting from one the next. The best example is Myspace and Facebook. Only a couple years ago everyone used to have Myspace and used to play with it all the time: decorating backgrounds of their own pages, adding music or friends, and uploading photos. I was one of those people who was addicted to Myspace. Myspace, however, has now faded away and Facebook has taken over: everyone is on Facebook all the time, and nobody goes to Myspace anymore. It is now the Facebook age. I still have a Myspace page but barely check it. I visit Facebook more often, and it is the website that I most visit today. The reason is very simple: it is to keep in touch with all my friends, especially who live apart. Since I was born and raised in Japan, I have a lot of friends there. I have many friends in California as well because I used to live there. Facebook is the best way to be in touch with them, because I do not need to keep all of their contact information. In addition, you can upload pictures on Facebook, so that I can see how they are doing. At the same time, I can show all of my friends how I am doing at once: I do not need to send photos to all of my friends. This is very convenient. Even my parents in Tokyo have just started Facebook to see how I am in the States, since I do not send them any pictures of me at all, even though they ask me often to do so. For people who have many friends in far away places, like me, Facebook is very convenient. In addition, it is easy to access to Facebook. That is why I visit Facebook often, and I think that it is the best interactive-able website now, at least to me.